Springfield Intersection Accident Lawyer
After an intersection crash, you are usually dealing with two things at once: real injuries, and another driver who insists the collision was your fault. Both deserve to be taken seriously. We are Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers, and we represent drivers, passengers, pedestrians, and cyclists hurt at Hampden County intersections. We treat clients the way we would want our own family treated, and we build the fault question on evidence rather than on which driver tells the story louder. The consultation is free, you pay no attorney's fee unless we recover for you, and case expenses are set out in a written fee agreement before we start. You can also visit our broader Springfield car accident page.
Why These Crashes Are DifferentThe Federal Highway Administration attributes roughly 40 percent of U.S. crashes to intersections, and the injuries run worse than the average because a side impact puts crash energy into a car door inches from a person, with far less structure to absorb it than a front or rear collision. Springfield sees these crashes at busy signalized junctions along State Street, Sumner Avenue, and Boston Road, at the X in Forest Park, and at the ramp intersections feeding I-91 and I-291, along with pedestrian conflicts downtown. The common thread in our cases is disputed fault: unlike a rear-end crash, an intersection collision almost always starts with both drivers pointing at each other.
Who Had the Right of WayMassachusetts sets specific rules, and each has real texture in practice. A left-turning driver may turn only when it can be done with reasonable safety, which is why left-turn collisions are among the most disputed cases we handle. A driver at a stop sign must stop and yield to vehicles already in the intersection or close enough to be an immediate hazard. Right turn on red is allowed only after a complete stop, only where no sign prohibits it, and Springfield posts No Turn on Red at many of its downtown signals, and only after yielding to pedestrians and cross traffic. Drivers approaching a rotary yield to traffic already in it. A green light is not a blank check either: Massachusetts law prohibits entering an intersection you cannot clear, and it never excuses a driver from watching for people and vehicles already lawfully there. Pedestrians have specific statutory protections in crosswalks, particularly where signals are absent or not operating, and a driver generally may not enter a marked crosswalk while a pedestrian is crossing in it.
When a driver breaks one of these rules, the proven violation is evidence of negligence a jury may consider, not automatic liability. The case is then built around establishing what actually happened in the second before impact, which is where these cases are won or lost.
Proving the Disputed SecondCamera footage. Business surveillance, transit buses, doorbell cameras, and dash cameras cover more intersections than most people expect. Retention periods are short, so spoliation letters and canvassing come first.
Signal records. Municipal and MassDOT signal timing plans, maintenance logs, and, where the controller kept them, event logs can show how the signal was programmed and whether it was working. They do not show what a driver saw, but they anchor the reconstruction, and knowing whether the city or the state controls a given signal is step one.
Vehicle data. Many vehicles record a few seconds of pre-impact speed and braking. The window is short and capability varies by vehicle, which is why we move to inspect and preserve both cars before repair or salvage.
Physical evidence. Crush direction, debris fields, gouge marks, and rest positions let a reconstruction expert rebuild the sequence when the drivers' accounts conflict.
Phone records. A driver who runs a red light was often looking at something else. Where the facts point that way, we pursue the distraction evidence in discovery.
We are honest about the hard cases: sometimes no camera exists and no data survived. Then the work is building the strongest circumstantial case from physical evidence and credibility, and we have done that work for a long time.
When the Insurer Blames YouExpect comparative negligence arguments: you were speeding, you entered on a stale yellow, you could have avoided it. Massachusetts law is more forgiving than insurers suggest. You can recover as long as you were 50 percent or less at fault compared with everyone you are claiming against, with your damages reduced by your percentage; at 51 percent, recovery is barred. That line is exactly why the evidence work above matters, and why we tell clients not to give the other insurer a recorded statement before we are involved.
Other defendants may belong in the case. Massachusetts law makes a vehicle's registration prima facie evidence that the driver was operating with the owner's authority, a presumption the owner must rebut. An employer may answer for a driver acting within the scope of their job, and rideshare crashes carry their own coverage tiers depending on whether the app was on or a ride was underway. In the occasional signal-malfunction or road-defect case, a public entity may be involved, and those claims carry strict notice rules: as little as 30 days written notice for road defect claims, and a two-year presentment requirement for claims against public employers, well before the general three-year statute of limitations.
What Your Claim Can IncludePIP pays up to $8,000 per person toward medical bills, lost wages at 75 percent, and replacement services, regardless of fault. With private health insurance, PIP typically pays the first $2,000 of medical bills before your health plan takes over; with MassHealth, Medicare, or certain self-funded employer plans, PIP generally pays first up to its limit. We coordinate that sequence and the liens that follow.
To recover for pain and suffering, Massachusetts requires reasonable and necessary medical expenses in excess of $2,000, or one of the listed qualifying injuries, such as a fracture or permanent and serious disfigurement. Past the threshold, the claim covers medical care past and future, lost earnings and diminished earning capacity, and pain and suffering. Massachusetts minimum bodily injury limits rose to $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident for policies written or renewed on or after July 1, 2025, and when serious injuries exceed the available coverage, we look to employer and umbrella policies and to your own underinsured motorist coverage, explained on our Springfield uninsured and underinsured motorist claims page.
One housekeeping item people miss: Massachusetts generally requires an operator's crash report to the RMV within five days when a crash causes injury or more than $1,000 in damage. We handle it with clients so nothing procedural trips the claim later.
Questions We Hear After Intersection CrashesNow we look for evidence neither of you controls: camera footage, signal records, vehicle data, physical reconstruction, neutral witnesses. Many disputed intersection cases stop being word against word once the scene is properly canvassed, and when they do not, we build the circumstantial case.
No. The officer usually did not see the crash, and a police report's conclusions are not the last word in a civil case. Reports can be supplemented and disputed, and juries weigh the evidence, not the checkbox.
No. A citation by itself is not proof in your civil case; what matters is proving the underlying violation with evidence, then connecting it to your injuries. The citation tells us where to dig.
Massachusetts law gives crosswalk pedestrians specific protections, and drivers, especially turning drivers, are required to yield in most of the situations that produce these injuries. PIP coverage is available to injured pedestrians, and the driver's liability coverage answers for the harm. The details depend on the signal and the crossing, and we sort those quickly.
No fee unless we recover for you. Our fee and how case expenses are handled are set out in a written contingency agreement, as Massachusetts law requires, before we begin.
Disputed fault is not a reason to wait; it is the reason to start. Contact Jeffrey Glassman Injury Lawyers today for a free, confidential case review, and if the insurer will not resolve it fairly, we are fully prepared to try the case in Hampden County.
This page is attorney advertising and general information, not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Every case is different, and past results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

